Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory49.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 141
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 796
82% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 88 84 85 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 110
Write 160
Mixed 144
SusWrite 85.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 28.1
93% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 125
104% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
787GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 371 322 286 317 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 471
Write 401
Mixed 315
SusWrite 330
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 29.6
114% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 186
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 77 80 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 134
Write 88
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 78
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 7TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 92 94 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 36
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 93.5
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
470GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 104
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
292% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback