Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '21 at 13:08
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 29.9 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 121 35% 66.6 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 451 38% 326 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8520) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.4% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 45.2 35% 42.2 fps	MRender 32 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 36.5 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 75 80 67 80 76 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 319 Write 131 Mixed 157 SusWrite 79.3 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 9.7 40% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 1.4 DQ Mixed 1.9 45% 119 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 189GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 162 154 200 199 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 173 Write 128 Mixed 139 SusWrite 157 34% 149 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 12 44% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 44.6 DQ Mixed 53.9 58% 100 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580 15,105 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 604GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 57 46 55 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 52.3 59% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 75%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2.5TB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 15 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 23.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 16.7 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 65%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 3,626 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 15 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 22.6 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 16.7 29% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 55%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 751GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 60.9 Write 63.2 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 2.1 46% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-22Z5HB0 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 6.5 4.9 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.7% Poor	Read 134 Write 109 Mixed 64 SusWrite 5.8 94% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 635GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 56 50 65 64 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 74.8 Write 68.1 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 51.9 80% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 38%
WDC WD10 EADS-00P8B0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 243GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 54 50 64 63 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.1% Poor	Read 63.1 Write 61 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 50.7 72% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB 3,428 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.3 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	585x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	161x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	106x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	40x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $713

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16