Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory28.7 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 23:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 582
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 40.3
26% 35.2 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 34
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 103 113 144 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 299
Write 258
Mixed 223
SusWrite 108
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 10.5
46% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 7.3
24% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF Winbond 25X/Q Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback