Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32.0078 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '18 at 21:21
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 96 2-Core 200 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 504 53% 423 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2724) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 3.69 3% 3.78 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8702 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 90 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15723637809	67.8% Good	Read 269 Write 213 Mixed 219 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 34.8 115% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 99.5 97% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 134%
Terra Master DAS 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 26.7 Mixed 29.5 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.38 122% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 106%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$70 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 326GB free Firmware: 04.06A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 192 3275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 296 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21666 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 296 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 118 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 177 (C2) HDA temperature 120 112 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86.1% Excellent	Read 152 Write 148 Mixed 140 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 3.65 4K Mixed 0.44 157% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 113%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 453GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 25.4 Mixed 23 33% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.16 75% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF Winbond 25X/Q Series 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SCL/X9SCM Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

CPU
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	3x
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
M4 512GBCrucial $74Bench 67%, 4,600 samples	1x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 159 samples	3x
M391B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 67 samples	1x
9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 49%, 115 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363