Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1487 x 795 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7360U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 42.8
1-Core 47
2-Core 90.2
35% 60 Pts
4-Core 95
8-Core 90.1
12% 92.6 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 1.5GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.5.0.49183
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.9
2% 4.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
236GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 91 56 29 78 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65% Good
Read 1,012
Write 810
Mixed 758
SusWrite 70.5
147% 663 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 12.1
45% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 130
101% 138 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 5.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 44%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback