Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 23:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7300 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 105
41% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 105
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 3.59
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 266
Write 107
Mixed 153
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 5.56
59% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 5.97
15% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Portable 1TB
817GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 31.1
Mixed 26.7
38% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.28
30% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FH8N0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback