Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 09:05
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 163
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 260
39% 284 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 108
Parallax 109
92% 110 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 83
82% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 105%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2012) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.4
5% 8.03 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1589 862 863 866 866 838 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,172
Write 1985
Mixed 1,316
SusWrite 981
361% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 69.5
225% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 707
538% 735 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 250%
Great: 297%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
588GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1663 1498 1417 1358 1391 1383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 1,905
Mixed 1,519
SusWrite 1,452
396% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.7
230% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 723
545% 737 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 281%
Great: 410%
Asmedia ASM1153 1TB
166GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 130 129 130 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 180
Write 114
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 131
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 23.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback