Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3420M APU 4,510 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 35.6 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 34.5 21% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 88.7 8-Core 67.3 11% 78 Pts	64-Core 78.7 5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G 8,067 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C625) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 2.6 0% 2.23 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.5 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Bory R500 240G 240GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1128B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 137 195 194 147 14 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 155 Mixed 167 SusWrite 116 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 11.4 40% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 75.2 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 0.5 30% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GB 479 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
UD PRO 256GBGigabyte $49Bench 84%, 2,163 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 479 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	3x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16