Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 00:59
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 657
69% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 141
Parallax 138
103% 135 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 300 300 298 297 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 448
Write 295
Mixed 274
SusWrite 291
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 28.7
106% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 169
133% 185 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
431GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 129 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 98.8
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 129
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 114%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
10GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.1 7.7 7.6 8.6 8.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Read 29
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.9
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback