Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '17 at 06:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 113
43% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 112
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.93
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 6.84
6% 7.75 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 8.78
7% 8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 512GB
233GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.12% Terrible
Read 38.8
Write 54.7
Mixed 50.2
11% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.13
4K Write 4.57
4K Mixed 1.87
11% 3.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 14%
Richdisk device 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 38%
Richdisk device 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 89.7
Write 74.6
Mixed 81.5
62% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.02
4K Write 3.87
4K Mixed 2.49
475% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2 3.0 Builds (Compare 719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback