Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 18:04
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 121
47% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 477
42% 356 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 81.5
48% 66.7 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 44.1
44% 55.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0302A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 76 53 48 59 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 248
Write 227
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 71
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 1.6
36% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 74.7
DQ Mixed 1.5
31% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
101GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 143 144 143 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 142
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
810GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 187 189 102 158 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 145
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 151
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.5 13 11 4.7 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 14.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 9.9
21% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.7
119% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 31.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback