| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180424 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '21 at 09:46 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
79.5%
Very good
|
72% 122 Pts
|
52% 408 Pts
|
28% 457 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.5%
Above average
|
60% 74.3 fps
|
52% 64.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 56 35 55 71 69 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
57% 259 MB/s
|
51% 16.4 MB/s
|
47% 81.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
67% 59.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,057 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 351x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 280x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 154x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 130x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 118x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $144Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 115x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $195 |