Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 181 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 357 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 296.88 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1.6 3% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AR1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 70.8 Write 29.3 Mixed 40 35% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 6GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16