Asrock 880G Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 880G Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110926
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '21 at 13:37
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 105 54% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 271 28% 228 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 76 78 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 354 Write 280 Mixed 240 SusWrite 76.2 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 18.2 87% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 24.3 26% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 100%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 38GB free Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 113 72 107 113 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 295 Write 240 Mixed 248 SusWrite 127 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 25.3 86% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 31.6 28% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 100%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 277GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 76 78 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 91.2 Write 86.8 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 76.3 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0909 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 27.2 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 27.7 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-11-9 DDR3-2000 Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX CL9-11-9 DDR3-2000 Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.3% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880G Pro3 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 880G Pro3

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	13x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	2x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	2x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	2x

SSD
SHFS37A480G 480GBKingstonBench 55%, 1,387 samples	11x
SHFS37A480G 480GBKingstonBench 53%, 15 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-400.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBKingstonBench 53%, 8 samples	3x
9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-439.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 62 samples	2x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 48%, 56 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16