Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 268
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 985
90% 754 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSF010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 177
Write 52.1
Mixed 93.4
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 8.4
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 63.1
37% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
426GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 97
Mixed 104
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Neo Forza NMUD480E82-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 21.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback