D Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemD Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X8DXD
Memory9.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime22 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 247
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 468
39% 338 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 54%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
Dell(1028 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 43
Parallax 28
11% 28.3 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 32.7
26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9440-8i 2TB
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7 13 16 26 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 186
Write 83.6
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 18
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: D Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback