Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion II P520 591 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 43 1-Core 7.6 2-Core 35.4 20% 28.7 Pts	4-Core 33.1 8-Core 19.6 4% 26.3 Pts	64-Core 18.4 1% 18.4 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21B8) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.8 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 91 83 102 105 76 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 134 Write 81.7 Mixed 111 SusWrite 96.7 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 16.3 38% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 99.8 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 16.3 27% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 129%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 119GB free, PID 0158 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 12 15 9.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 14.9 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 12.7 20% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 77% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 800, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16