Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 180 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 494 50% 407 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.56 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 6.7 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 7.1 7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 475GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 119 120 132 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 284 Write 149 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 120 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.7 320% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR8C 3x4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3 of 8 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 29.1 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

CPU
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	1x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $262

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16