Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 289
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,089
99% 829 Pts
64-Core 2,044
126% 2,044 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5475 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 222
Reflection 179
Parallax 209
181% 203 fps
Gravity 155
Splatting 113
116% 134 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 284 250 231 194 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,255
Write 537
Mixed 615
SusWrite 265
147% 668 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 30.6
101% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 524
418% 592 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 126%
Great: 448%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
997GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 75 75 78 82 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 73.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 73.8
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 92%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 176 181 174 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 47.5
Write 133
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 173
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid KINGSTON RBU-SC4 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 505A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 134 133 136 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 163
Mixed 176
SusWrite 131
131% 176 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 6
1,044% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 117%
Seagate Innov8 8TB
263GB free
Firmware: CE07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 156 150 155 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 107
Write 98
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 154
71% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 86%
Amd-raid KingDian S100 16 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 72 72 74 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
Read 134
Write 84.4
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 70.1
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.9
1,011% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Amd-raid ST14000DM001-2JC 14TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 132 134 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 140
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 132
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.1
728% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 37.3
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 31.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 100 34.1" 1280 720 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback