Today's hottest deals

MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 71.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 1,028
92% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,667
103% 1,667 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 133
Parallax 140
101% 132 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 123
Splatting 116
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$129
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1619 1609 1546 1443 1455 1377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 1,825
Mixed 1,609
SusWrite 1,508
399% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 71.7
264% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,050
790% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 307%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
426GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 477 467 462 462 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 462
Mixed 403
SusWrite 468
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66.4
206% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
76GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,348
Write 1,826
Mixed 949
377% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 74.1
265% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 1,034
804% 1110 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 168 173 175 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 169
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 171
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Innov8 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: CE07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 179 175 181 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 178
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.5
238% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Innov8 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: CE07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 171 162 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 119
Write 136
Mixed 31
SusWrite 169
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.6
239% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 27.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback