MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 23:43
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 335
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,281
115% 968 Pts
64-Core 2,344
145% 2,344 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 147
Parallax 137
118% 143 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 149
Splatting 125
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,828
Write 4,810
Mixed 3,290
890% 3,976 MB/s
4K Read 80
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 105
380% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,643
DQ Write 1320
DQ Mixed 1,493
1,114% 1,485 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 595%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
815GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 455 454 444 455 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 457
Mixed 445
SusWrite 454
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 60.1
196% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 118%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
110GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 416 345 324 303 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 456
Mixed 459
SusWrite 358
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 56.1
184% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
132GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 401 351 346 340 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 376
Mixed 426
SusWrite 372
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 59.7
195% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WDC WD4003FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 239 244 241 242 241 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 246
Write 243
Mixed 101
SusWrite 242
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
9% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 4.3
DQ Mixed 3.1
2% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4R.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 66.7
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 39
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 40.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 135%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 6R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 50% 40 342 278 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELA07A DELL U2412M
History: Score 7: 1R 0G 2B | Score 43: 7R 0G 8B | Score 56: 6R 6G 8B
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback