Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory33.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU:
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 69
2-Core 143
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 495
45% 376 Pts
64-Core 1,198
74% 1,198 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.55
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 212
Parallax 203
142% 197 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 158
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 131%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 116 80 80 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 498
Write 479
Mixed 409
SusWrite 150
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 41.2
138% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 357
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 121%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
912GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 849 849 852 833 853 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,581
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 965
315% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 51.3
170% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 452
329% 431 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 194%
Great: 276%
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.3% Good
Read 106
Write 129
Mixed 71
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
77GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 83 87 86 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
140GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 62 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 111
Write 133
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 62.1
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 131 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 63.5
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 132
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-111.A00 Hynix HMT451U7AFR8A-P Hynix HMT451U7AFR8A-P Hynix HMT451U7AFR8A-P Hynix HMT451U7AFR8A-P F3-12800CL10-8G F3-12800CL10-8G 40GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACR0574 ED322Q
Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback