MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory39.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 990
89% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 78.3
47% 65 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 43
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1512 813 827 824 832 749 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,744
Mixed 1,379
SusWrite 926
317% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64.6
215% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 415
419% 700 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 224%
Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
397GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 444 442 441 448 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 451
Mixed 400
SusWrite 446
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 50.4
165% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 203
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
186GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 461 460 459 444 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 453
Mixed 451
SusWrite 427
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 49.4
160% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 172 178 177 178 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Hitachi HUH 721212ALE604 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: LEGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 164 165 167 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 118
Write 59.7
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 164
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.6
387% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-8GVKB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 0" 1280 720 UHD TV
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback