MSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7966
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 23:54
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 645
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 241 245 245 223 231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 292
Write 343
Mixed 299
SusWrite 237
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 41.1
134% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 148
148% 237 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 115%
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 814 827 827 774 789 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1547
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,331
SusWrite 916
315% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.8
198% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 788
565% 733 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 211%
Great: 269%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 796 799 810 795 804 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,395
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 839
391% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 70.2
236% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 759
557% 729 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 252%
Great: 346%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
881GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 87 84 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 98.8
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 85.1
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 100%
WD WUH 721414ALE604 14TB
1TB free
Firmware: LDAZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 134 133 135 127 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 133
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.5
428% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 120%
Hitachi HUH 721212ALE604 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LEGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 233 233 227 231 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 231
Mixed 103
SusWrite 232
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.3
303% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: SNEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 184 184 184 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
804GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 113 112 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966) Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback