Biostar H410MH

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar H410MH (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200603
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 248 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 697 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0464) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 47.6 30% 41.1 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 27.4 26% 32 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2PSM1BT240GB 240GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 83 1.1 16 39 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 439 Write 317 Mixed 109 SusWrite 43.9 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 1 9% 5.03 MB/s	DQ Read 92.7 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 19.5 23% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 81%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 108 65% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E82-2666E 2x8GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 24.5 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 27 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 5R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	42%	40	236	139	75	23.8"	1920 1080	KIG2380 238 Monitor

History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 47: 5R 5G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	303x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	291x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	141x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	72x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16