Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 17:17
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 70 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 154 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 440 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 50.7 Parallax 7.8 5% 21.5 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 9.1 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 671 528 136 163 175 177 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 1,100 Write 872 Mixed 890 SusWrite 308 177% 793 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 50.1 161% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 431 DQ Mixed 490 358% 467 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 818GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1859 1715 1735 1734 1736 1696 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 1,832 Write 1765 Mixed 1,559 SusWrite 1,746 389% 1,726 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 48.3 167% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 716 DQ Write 503 DQ Mixed 635 467% 618 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.9% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 21.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 7.4 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	120	15.5"	1280 720	BOE08FB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	454x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	246x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	204x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16