Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 132 2-Core 252 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 820 77% 639 Pts	64-Core 1053 65% 1053 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 109 Parallax 104 83% 105 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 101 82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,042 Write 7129 Mixed 7,109 1,656% 7,427 MB/s	4K Read 561 4K Write 224 4K Mixed 302 1,356% 362 MB/s	DQ Read 1,270 DQ Write 637 DQ Mixed 772 622% 893 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 310GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 479 479 480 480 480 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 480 Mixed 394 SusWrite 479 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 44.2 152% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 768GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 160GB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 34 20 21 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 51.1 Write 78.7 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 29.4 32% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.9 360% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 232%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 6GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 68 62 60 54 53 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 92.2 Write 84.8 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 62.3 93% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 21.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 23.4 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	30	84.6"	1280 701	SAM0C42 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,057x
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	508x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	249x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	497x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	385x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	251x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	194x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	111x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	102x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16