Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 57.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 288
84% 162 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 899
86% 707 Pts
64-Core 1768
109% 1768 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 72
59% 70.5 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 72
Splatting 62.2
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 240 341 297 253 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 446
Write 419
Mixed 352
SusWrite 296
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 218
183% 264 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
242GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 418 404 413 404 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 440
Mixed 427
SusWrite 410
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 45.3
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST4000NC001-1FS168 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 145 144 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 141
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
150GB free
Firmware: MKAONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 82 85 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 88.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 83.2
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-3000C16-8GISB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 7R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 64% 33 78 61 144 24" 1920 1080 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback