PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1750 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191108 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 16 '21 at 18:39 |
Run Duration | 214 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
80%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU630 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 5.4 60 5.9 24 45 MB/s
|
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
331GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 151 150 150 149 MB/s
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
77.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52% | 34% | 59 | 283 | 260 | 75 | 20.2" | 1750 1080 | AOC2260 2260WG5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 479x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 386x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $310 |