Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 285
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,066
98% 821 Pts
64-Core 1386
86% 1386 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 64.7
54% 65.2 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 62.4
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 266 263 264 265 263 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,100
Write 1,347
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 319
273% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 76.3
262% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 1,008
756% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
112GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 106 97 90 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 246
Write 129
Mixed 164
SusWrite 93.5
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 36.5
123% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 93.6
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 104
81% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
419GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 419 425 428 441 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 439
Mixed 385
SusWrite 424
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 54.5
176% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
575GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 151 153 153 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 132
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 152
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.5 4 4 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 10.9
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.8
14% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback