Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 571
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B4E) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 56.3
45% 58.9 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 57
48% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1754 1847 1824 1734 1744 1694 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,139
Write 1,955
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 1,766
366% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 60.5
197% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 676
523% 718 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 248%
Great: 421%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 29.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 22.3
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 68%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
24GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 39
Write 35.4
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 20.4
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 01BA M4S16S681LJJJ43-12 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 21% 34 266 188 60 17.3" 1707 960 AUO429D
Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback