Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 125
60% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 331
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 19.3
17% 19 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 9.6
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 19 87 9.2 48 7.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 177
Write 111
Mixed 181
SusWrite 29.7
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 19.1
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 76.7
85% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
101GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 42 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 27.2
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 46.6
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 43%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 107GB
50GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 12 0 4.3 0 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65% Good
Read 208
Write 200
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 17.8
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.5
283% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 138%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
118GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 12 0 4.3 0 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 107
Write 86.7
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 17.9
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
211% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 3R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 14% 65 70 58 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7D02 BenQ V2400Eco
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 16: 1R 3G 2B | Score 31: 3R 5G 1B
Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback