To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170209
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 00:13
Run Duration	340 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 48.8 1-Core 15.1 2-Core 34.7 24% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 77.9 8-Core 180 15% 129 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 20.7 13% 17.1 fps	MRender 17.7 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 15.7 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 18 18 56 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 38.8 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 67%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 305GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 26 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 26.9 19% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 143% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	5%	84	191	93	60	19"	1280 1024	DEL405A DELL P190S

History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 15: 2R 1G 2B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 12: 2R 0G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16