Clevo P170HMx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo P170HMx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P170HMx
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime12 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 02:00
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 60
2-Core 97.4
42% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 75.4
8% 61.1 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M
Clevo(1558 7100) 2GB
CLim: 575 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 18
Parallax 3.9
10% 11.4 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 12.5
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.9 8.6 9.9 8.4 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 256%
WD My Passport 2TB
79GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 82 91 74 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 55.2
Write 55.8
Mixed 37
SusWrite 79.5
78% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-040.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 HSD06A5 HSD173PUW1
Typical P170HMx Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P170HMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback