PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191029 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 07 '21 at 05:48 |
Run Duration | 260 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
73.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
550GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 319 318 320 322 324 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 255 143 113 111 105 MB/s
|
75.9%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston SKC300F37A480G 480GB
265GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 281 259 252 243 244 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Portable 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 28 29 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
53% | 49% | 35 | 214 | 92 | 144 | 27" | 1920 1080 | ACR0628 ED273 A |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,507x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 782x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 695x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 497x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 307x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |