MSI MS-78511

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-B08911
MotherboardMSI MS-78511  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 01:39
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 131
61% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 154
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
MSI(1462 8A9E) 2GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 12.5
7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 35 59 56 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 131
Write 112
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 46.5
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
17GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 39.3
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 39
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
50GB free
Firmware: A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 77 77 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 80.6
Write 58.8
Mixed 44.9
SusWrite 77.2
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 70%
Toshiba StorE HDD 750GB
125GB free, PID 0b15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 34 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 36
Write 34.9
Mixed 22
SusWrite 34.9
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
SDXC Card 128GB
89GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 75 73 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 87.4
Write 75.9
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 75.3
101% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.7
256% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LU1MNG/8G Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 10GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 7% 46 156 90 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DFA SAMSUNG
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 7: 1R 0G 2B
Typical MS-78511 Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-78511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback