bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon D-1540
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 123
53% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 479
45% 373 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 70GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 995
Write 877
Mixed 452
172% 775 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 19.3
66% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 411
315% 428 MB/s
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 215GB
195GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 32 33 30 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 55
Write 65.3
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 31.5
40% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 3.5
626% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 96%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 81GB
8GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 36 50 42 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback