bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory11.2 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10320
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.4% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 267
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 679
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 107GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 229 56 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 365
Write 163
Mixed 196
SusWrite 82.8
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 7.5
49% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 80.5
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 6.3
16% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 71%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 215GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 176 177 181 174 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 141
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 173
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 15GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 12032 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 89%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback