Fujitsu CELSIUS W480

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W480 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2917-A1
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100818
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 136 53% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 198 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V) 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 6% AMD(1002 240A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 7.8 Parallax 5.9 6% 6.87 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 7.1 6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 197 222 233 233 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.4% Good	Read 238 Write 227 Mixed 226 SusWrite 208 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 29.6 98% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 197 146% 193 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 128%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 28GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 27 30 30 30 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.72% Terrible	Read 30.1 Write 26.2 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 27.7 6% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 4.7 15% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 13 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 25: 4R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	18%	39	94	58	30	23.8"	1463 823	DELA0BE DELL P2415Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W480 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W480

CPU
Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples	10x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	6x
Xeon X3480IntelBench 72%, 524 samples	2x

GPU
FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)ATIBench 9%, 444 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
64GB SSD 64GBForeseeBench 51%, 434 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x

RAM
9905471-009.A00LF 0198 9905471-009.A00LF 0707 HU564403EP0200 12GBUnknownBench 38%, 5 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 108 samples	2x
M391B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 38%, 22 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16