Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 645 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5150M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 50.7
21% 34.3 Pts
4-Core 57.6
8-Core 61.5
8% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 52.9
3% 52.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 72 68 53 72 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.3% Very poor
Read 108
Write 80.5
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 60.3
18% 80 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 6.7
26% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 114
71% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 7% 85 18 5 60 14" 1280 768 CMN1495
Typical ProBook 645 G1 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback