Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H270-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$83
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 225
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 431
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 109
Parallax 97.7
78% 101 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 97.4
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 125 101 82 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 434
Write 413
Mixed 359
SusWrite 103
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 40.4
142% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 220
172% 238 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
359GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 114 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 150
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 111
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 1TB
454GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 36 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 40.3
Write 38.1
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 36.1
43% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 6R 8G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 72% 32 274 190 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27C8 ASUS VP278
History: Score 48: 5R 5G 8B | Score 63: 6R 8G 9B
Typical PRIME H270-PRO Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback