Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82MA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 155
79% 131 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 225
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 11.4
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 9
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
473GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 999 1103 1087 930 276 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,335
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 778
260% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 75.5
280% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 496
396% 570 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 215%
Great: 236%
SDXC 512GB
146GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 31 31 31 31 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 13.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 13" 1280 720 LEN8290
Typical 82MA Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback