Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82MA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 22:34
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 222
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 428
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 23.1
12% 18.8 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 0.2
10% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
606GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 206 207 176 209 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 578
Write 178
Mixed 268
SusWrite 193
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 18.5
105% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 104
165% 328 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 236%
SDHC 16GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 18.5
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 10.3
20% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
219% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 13.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 13.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MA Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback