Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 837 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 229 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 531 56% 447 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 634GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 457 461 456 457 456 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 413 Mixed 378 SusWrite 457 96% 424 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 39.5 134% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 334 251% 336 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Nvme PM951 SAMSUNG 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 192GB free Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 572 573 570 567 569 568 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 910 Write 571 Mixed 426 SusWrite 570 138% 619 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 37.9 177% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,038 DQ Write 583 DQ Mixed 601 503% 741 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 183%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS7MFR8N-TF 4x16GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 55.4 MC Mixed 25.6 123% 43 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 41.3 SC Mixed 23.2 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	602x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	240x
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	128x

SSD
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	38x
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	26x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	23x

RAM
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 69%, 5,073 samples	147x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	106x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 69%, 1,506 samples	72x