Asus PRIME H310M-F R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-F R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 130 2-Core 255 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 749 78% 629 Pts	64-Core 711 44% 711 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 38.7 31% 39.4 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Afox SD250-480GB 480GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1128B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 391 420 390 421 406 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 391 Mixed 363 SusWrite 404 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 25.7 136% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 38.4 77% 148 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 94%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 9GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.7 11 12 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 86.3 Write 7.2 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 8.5 33% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.7 239% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB 691 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 10.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	15	112	7	120	25"	1920 1080	WAM2500 E24FHD-G

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-F R2.0 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-F R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	171x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	144x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	40x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
240GB 240GBNetacBench 66%, 2,483 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	13x
BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 1x8GBCrucialBench 47%, 355 samples	13x
CB8GU2666.C8JT 1x8GBCrucialBench 44%, 529 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16