Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$203
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 104
53% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 361
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 84 100 82 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 215
Write 138
Mixed 181
SusWrite 84.9
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 21.5
62% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 38.7
39% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 93%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
178GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 100 83 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 90.4
Write 182
Mixed 184
SusWrite 85.2
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 22.5
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 36.5
38% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST4000DM004-2CV104 2TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 85 100 84 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 146
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 85.4
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 8% 59 66 54 60 7.2" 1280 729 SAM04FB SAMSUNG
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback