Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 69
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 956
93% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,405
87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 89.3
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 80.4
73% 85.1 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 68
67% 84.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 1TB
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1171 1240 1233 1266 1300 1257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Sandisk G5 B 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 155 156 158 168 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 393
Write 374
Mixed 266
SusWrite 159
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 22.2
83% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 110
90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid Array 5 281GB
259GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 202 187 214 211 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.3% Above average
Read 306
Write 376
Mixed 260
SusWrite 204
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 24.8
93% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.3
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 90.5
81% 120 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
337GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 146 123 126 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 25.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 75 27" 1280 720 HPN348A HP Z27n G2
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback