Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 884
93% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 290
Parallax 361
254% 321 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 257
Splatting 188
208% 265 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 211%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 378 388 396 377 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 410
Write 309
Mixed 249
SusWrite 372
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 41.7
119% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 85.7
94% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 122%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
987GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 325 327 333 315 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 310
Write 344
Mixed 277
SusWrite 319
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 27.6
91% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 70
75% 129 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 88%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 162 162 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 181
Write 160
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 161
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 1
60% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
174GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 1956 1950 1933 1742 1444 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,770
Write 2,868
Mixed 2,032
SusWrite 1,853
535% 2,381 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 58.8
200% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1308
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 695
571% 839 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 326%
Great: 477%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
60GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,000
Write 1,414
Mixed 661
298% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.8
178% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 620
514% 752 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 36.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 36.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 3R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 46% 24 336 273 144 48.9" 3840 1080 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
History: Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 25: 3R 1G 7B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback