MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 243
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 748
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,270
79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 39.1
32% 40 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 35.6
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 395
Mixed 381
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 35.5
124% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 172
131% 184 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
68GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 231 77 81 82 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 456
Write 395
Mixed 391
SusWrite 157
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 32.6
108% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 134
110% 165 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
559GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 89 90 88 91 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 80.6
Write 113
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 84.5
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
178% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
732GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 117 116 118 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 148
Write 112
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 115
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 126 125 128 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 106
Write 124
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 124
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
246% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 4R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 42% 31 188 123 60 27.5" 2560 1440 SAM0D63 U28E510
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback