Today's hottest deals

MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 18:34
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 704
76% 604 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 216 217 216 218 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,349
Write 910
Mixed 1,023
SusWrite 251
196% 883 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 72
261% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 553
482% 707 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 185%
Great: 199%
Generic External 500GB
255GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 14 13 15 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 12.2
15% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 1TB
710GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 86.4
Write 87.9
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 89.4
106% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 5% 78 37 6 60 7.2" 1360 768 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 7: 0R 1G 4B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B
Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 4,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback